|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [Moderator Action] Inheritance and Identity-constraint
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 26 Feb 2001 17:20:39 +0000 To: Faroukh Fekravar <fekravar@austin.apc.slb.com> Cc: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@allette.com.au>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-ID: <f5bpug5mkd4.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Faroukh Fekravar <fekravar@austin.apc.slb.com> writes: > I don't understand why the second alternative (define the key within the Item > element itself) > is useless and moreover why it's not equal to the first one. Because the location of the definition determines the scope of the identity constraint. Defining it on Item itself amounts to saying "The value of the Id attribute of an Item is unique within that Item", which is trivially satisfied. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/Received on Monday, 26 February 2001 12:20:49 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|

![Re: [Moderator Action] Inheritance and Identity-constraint](/images/get_stylus.gif)




