[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Identifying absent behavior

From: Chan, Philip <Philip.Chan@rbccm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:37:36 -0500
Message-ID: <A2AB950B23E5D411B23C00805FA7BBC80195EEEA@TOTOMB04>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
RE: Identifying absent behavior
It seems to me that there is no difference between <t></t> and <t/>
according to schema definition.  Let me know if I am wrong.  If you just
want to prevent empty tag, you could use minOccurs='1'.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Garrett Steed [SMTP:gmsteed@seasllc.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:54 AM
> To:	xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: Identifying absent behavior
> 
> Thank you for the reply:
> 
> I would like to specifically disallow this:
> Absent c element: <t><t> <t/>
> When parsing a document there must be a string with in the <t/> tags.
> Sorry if the previous email was not clear.
> 
> Thanks Again 
> Garrett
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 10:38:08 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.