|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Identifying absent behavior
From: Chan, Philip <Philip.Chan@rbccm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:37:36 -0500 Message-ID: <A2AB950B23E5D411B23C00805FA7BBC80195EEEA@TOTOMB04> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org It seems to me that there is no difference between <t></t> and <t/> according to schema definition. Let me know if I am wrong. If you just want to prevent empty tag, you could use minOccurs='1'. > -----Original Message----- > From: Garrett Steed [SMTP:gmsteed@seasllc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:54 AM > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: Re: Identifying absent behavior > > Thank you for the reply: > > I would like to specifically disallow this: > Absent c element: <t><t> <t/> > When parsing a document there must be a string with in the <t/> tags. > Sorry if the previous email was not clear. > > Thanks Again > Garrett > >Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 10:38:08 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






