RE: implementing redefines - additional test

> 
> > Although we redefine "dummy.xsd", which neither contains, nor
> > includes/imports the "base" type, this type was somehow redefined;
> > Is this the expected behaviour or a bug?
> 
> Stricly speaking, that's a bug.
> 

When we speak of bugs, surely we always speak strictly?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/