|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: performance testing of schemas
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:03:48 +0000 To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> Cc: "'Bryan Rasmussen'" <brs@itst.dk>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <f5b3bl2abgr.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Kay writes: > Is it conformant to use a schema for validating instances without reporting > the errors that appear in unused parts of the schema? In principle, it's not conformant, because a schema with errors isn't a schema. OTOH, there evidently _is_ a bug-free schema which is sufficient for some validation episodes -- let's just say you used an oracle and constructed that schema and used it, conformantly. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDmUh0kjnJixAXWBoRAmzcAJ9KfB2efhp64K6n2HDwxPXr8psB/QCdGIb7 CDhBm+hVrUKuDKLxIOZZet8= =0lRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 09:06:24 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






