|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: performance testing of schemas
From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:26:04 -0000 To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "'Bryan Rasmussen'" <brs@itst.dk> Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <E1EkOb2-0007Sz-OY@maggie.w3.org> > My experience is that schema 'compilation' completely swamps > schema-based > 'validation', so the first thing to do in any performance testing is > to separate these two phases. With this in mind I've been thinking about "lazy" or incremental compilation of schemas, to avoid compiling the parts that aren't used in a particular validation episode. Is it conformant to use a schema for validating instances without reporting the errors that appear in unused parts of the schema? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:26:25 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






