|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] SV: empty elements and xsd:string
From: Bryan Rasmussen <brs@itst.dk>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:11:30 +0100 Message-ID: <D45A5694803BE943BA46F9A7262BF83D123653@its42.itst.local> To: 'George Cristian Bina' <george@oxygenxml.com> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Okay thanks George, But I'm wondering now, does this mean that there are also empty nonNegativeIntegers and the like? Best Regards, Bryan Rasmussen -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: George Cristian Bina [mailto:george@oxygenxml.com] Sendt: 21. februar 2005 13:07 Til: Bryan Rasmussen Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Emne: Re: empty elements and xsd:string Hi Bryan, That is an empty string. For instance the XML Schema specification part 2 contains an example that defines a non empty string so it is clear that the empty string is accepted by xs:string. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ 4 Datatype components 4.3 Constraining Facets 4.3.2 minLength http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#rf-minLength Example The following is the definition of a ·user-derived· datatype which requires strings to have at least one character (i.e., the empty string is not in the ·value space· of this datatype). <simpleType name='non-empty-string'> <restriction base='string'> <minLength value='1'/> </restriction> </simpleType> Best Regards, George --------------------------------------------------------------------- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > > I've encountered validators which accept an empty element the content of > which is specified as being of type xsd:string. This strikes me as being > wrong, and references to why it would be okay? > > >Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 14:18:03 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






