Re: support for substitution groups, support for redefines?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bryan Rasmussen writes:


> Does anyone have a good overview of how well substitution groups and
> redefines are supported in various processors. >

Substitution groups are much simple to implement and use correctly
than redefine, so I'd hope that interop was pretty good, but I have no
concrete evidence about this, beyond the lack of email to this or
other lists complaining about specific instances of problems.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCzO4WkjnJixAXWBoRAroQAJ91BaB/K+aXgQXIM3kcl1p1A4jE7gCfd5qM
K9AMp/OYIPiPMNpKxQ1YVKo=
=Y54/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----