|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [Bulk] Trying to Understand Complex Abstract Types: How To Define?
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:44:21 +0000 To: Eric Sirois <easirois@rogers.com> Cc: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>, xml-schema-dev <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <f5bsm2ltouy.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk> I'm afraid your example/discussion depends on knowledge of a schema (DITA?) which I'm not familiar with. There are a number of circumstances in which substitution groups can't be used: 1) The desired target (substitution group head) is a declared locally, within some complex type definition, rather than at the top-level; 2) The desired target has an anonymous type definition; 3) The desired target or its type have blocked substitution either directly via 'block' or indirectly, via 'final'. Not sure which of these cases you're pointing to. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 08:44:36 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|

![Re: [Bulk] Trying to Understand Complex Abstract Types: How To Define?](/images/get_stylus.gif)




