|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Versioning of XML Schema and namespaces
From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 10:10:51 -0700 Message-Id: <8E9F0028F5955844899380433C60E39905F87901@cscrdemsg001.crdc.kp.org> To: "'Dan Vint'" <dvint@dvint.com>, "'Eliot Kimber'" <ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>, John.Hockaday@ga.gov.au, xmlschema-dev@w3.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Vint [mailto:dvint@dvint.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:23 AM > To: Biron,Paul V; 'Eliot Kimber'; John.Hockaday@ga.gov.au; > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: RE: Versioning of XML Schema and namespaces > > At 03:15 PM 5/4/2005, Biron,Paul V wrote: > >For what it's worth, the reason the XML Schema WG made > >xsi:schemaLocation a hint was for security reasons. Depending on > >circumstances, it can be very dangerous to trust the > >sender/author to tell you what DTD/schema to use to > >validate against. After all, one of the main reasons > >to perform validation is because you don't trust the > >sender/author...so why would you trust them when they > >tell you what DTD/schema to use? > > So why don't catalogs handle this problem? Catalog allows me > to say file x that you reference should be file b on my > system - not the one you reference. I never said that catalogs couldn't handle this problem...sorry if it sounded like I was saying that. I was just making the simple point that if you don't trust the sender to put a valid integer in some attribute or to order elements a certain way why are you so willing to trust that they will put the "right" public ID in the document? pvbReceived on Thursday, 5 May 2005 17:22:26 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






