|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: reference to element, elementFormDefault unqualified
From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:12:12 +0100 To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> Cc: "'Oliver Kusche'" <oli@trip.net>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <000001c66178$e799e470$6401a8c0@turtle> > I often use this as an example of the downsides of > freezing one part of your stack (XML and Namespaces) before you fully > architect closely related ones (Schema and maybe Query I tend to the view that most of the horrors of namespaces are because they are at the wrong level of the stack in the first place; as is the Infoset. Describing any of this as "architected" seems an abuse of the term: it was put together by jobbing builders. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Sunday, 16 April 2006 17:12:46 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






