[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: reference to element, elementFormDefault unqualified

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:12:12 +0100
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "'Oliver Kusche'" <oli@trip.net>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c66178$e799e470$6401a8c0@turtle>
RE: reference to element

> I often use this as an example of the downsides of
> freezing one part of your stack (XML and Namespaces)  before you fully
> architect closely related ones (Schema and maybe Query

I tend to the view that most of the horrors of namespaces are because they
are at the wrong level of the stack in the first place; as is the Infoset.
Describing any of this as "architected" seems an abuse of the term: it was
put together by jobbing builders.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 
Received on Sunday, 16 April 2006 17:12:46 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.