|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] xs:list derived
From: Moog, Thomas H <thomas.h.moog@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:50:43 -0400 Message-ID: <93EBD06E7FC53940A911468FF9BBAD7D680D99@hdsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com> To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> In Schema Part I 2nd edition section 3.14.6 (Constraints on Simple Type Definitions) subsection Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) item 2.3.1 2 If the {variety} is list, then all of the following must be true: 2.1 The {item type definition} must have a {variety} of atomic or union (in which case all the {member type definitions} must be atomic). 2.2 (empty) 2.3 The appropriate case among the following must be true: 2.3.1 If the {base type definition} is the *simple ur-type definition* , then all of the following must be true: 2.3.1.1 The {final} of the {item type definition} must not contain list. 2.3.1.2 The {facets} must only contain the whiteSpace facet component. First, what is the idea behind clause 2.3.1.2 ? Second, can soneone give me an example of such an invalid schema, since I can't seem unable to create one which fails this test.Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 15:56:07 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






