[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

xs:list derived

From: Moog, Thomas H <thomas.h.moog@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:50:43 -0400
Message-ID: <93EBD06E7FC53940A911468FF9BBAD7D680D99@hdsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
xs:list derived

In Schema Part I 2nd edition section 3.14.6 (Constraints on Simple Type
Definitions) subsection Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) 
item 2.3.1 

2 If the {variety} is list, then all of the following must be true:
2.1 The {item type definition} must have a {variety} of atomic or union
(in which case all the {member type definitions} must be atomic).
2.2 (empty)
2.3 The appropriate case among the following must be true:
2.3.1 If the {base type definition} is the *simple ur-type definition* ,
then all of the following must be true:
2.3.1.1 The {final} of the {item type definition} must not contain list.
2.3.1.2 The {facets} must only contain the whiteSpace facet component. 

First, what is the idea behind clause 2.3.1.2 ?
Second, can soneone give me an example of such an invalid schema, since
I can't seem unable to create one which fails this test.  
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 15:56:07 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.