|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xsd:simpletype or <xsd:complexType with simpleContent?
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:58:53 +0000 To: Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-ID: <f5br77ci602.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Vint writes: > I'll have to check into this more. This was in terms of redfine - my > original statement. Sorry, I missed the redefine part before. In that case, you're right. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDx7IdkjnJixAXWBoRAtDHAJ0alFmGduSZpITUI5emS9r3FbTTUQCfZ0gE I2eRCp6xE2uOAYvJA5pvMYI= =0nyv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 13:59:01 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






