|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Schema
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:50:26 +0000 To: "Jack Lindsey" <tuquenukem@hotmail.com> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, chandrashekarrvt@gmail.com Message-ID: <f5bvewf2mx9.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jack Lindsey writes: > Why was [XPath in Identity Constraints] so restricted and is that a > good thing in your opinion? > > I mean it is not very orthogonal when compared to XPointer, XSLT, > XQuery and Schematron. The decision was based, IIRC, on a desire to minimize complexity, both for readers and for implementors. There was a particular concern to ensure that a streaming schema validator could be built, something which a richer XPath subset would have precluded. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0MBykjnJixAXWBoRAu0sAJ9Ngt0BSSSqpLaTp7phvCH9oTSMwQCdERlk s5hA3ZplTgcyL2/yM6oyL9U= =qAPd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 10:50:40 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






