|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema
From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:29:46 -0700 Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20060309172923.0403ccf8@rgmstimap.oraclecorp.com> To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> Cc: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>, <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> At 3/9/2006 05:14 PM, Michael Kay wrote: > > > > Gee, Mike, > > > > I'm truly flattered at your assertion that [we] relational > > people messed up > > some "clean design". Didn't realize we had that much power. ;^) > >Well, let's just say that I think we would have had a more coherent set of >basic data types if we hadn't had so many people throwing in their >ha'penceworth from diametrically opposite directions. I wouldn't argue with that... >Come to think of it, the same is probably true of SQL. In SPADES! Jim >Mike ======================================================================== Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144 Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345 Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com 1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name ======================================================================== = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions = = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = ========================================================================Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 00:37:56 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|

![RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema](/images/get_stylus.gif)




