|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema
From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:16:50 -0000 Message-ID: <005201c64466$7165fca0$0600a8c0@RW> To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org> Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, <xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>; <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org> > Original Message From: "Michael Kay" >> Oh dear. If the data binding folks are going to be stakeholders in this, >> we >> can throw out all hopes of a clean design. They'll mess it up even worse >> than the relational people did. > > Gee thanks. I was just about to ask some questions about these various > approaches, but don't think I'll bother. Um, on reflection I might have over reacted there. But let's face it, slurs don't come bigger than that :-) Mind you, I always thought it was the doc-heads that messed it up. At least I know who to blame now! Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 17:17:13 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|

![Re: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema](/images/get_stylus.gif)




