|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema
From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:25:28 -0700 Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20060309122400.03e8fb88@rgmstimap.oraclecorp.com> To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> Cc: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>, <ElektonikaMail@frink.w3.org>, <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, <xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org> Gee, Mike, I'm truly flattered at your assertion that [we] relational people messed up some "clean design". Didn't realize we had that much power. ;^) Jim At 3/9/2006 12:06 PM, Michael Kay wrote: > > It is unclear how data binding tools would > > support the conditional assignment of types. I'm not saying that it > > couldn't be done but I've yet to seen anyone spell out how to > > handle it. > >Oh dear. If the data binding folks are going to be stakeholders in this, we >can throw out all hopes of a clean design. They'll mess it up even worse >than the relational people did. > >Michael Kay >http://www.saxonica.com/ ======================================================================== Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144 Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345 Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com 1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name ======================================================================== = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions = = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = ========================================================================Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 19:32:37 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|

![RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema](/images/get_stylus.gif)




