|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Difference between xs:simpleType & xs:complexType
From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:53:25 +0100 Message-ID: <001e01c7802e$9d809890$2400a8c0@Codalogic> To: "selvam" <jps_cse@yahoo.co.in>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Hi Selvam, You may find the following introduction to schema useful: http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/xsd-overview.html HTH, Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/ http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ ============================================= ----- Original Message ----- From: "selvam" <jps_cse@yahoo.co.in> To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:44 AM Subject: Difference between xs:simpleType & xs:complexType > > Hi, > Can anyone help me in explaining the difference between the xs:simpleType > & > xs:complexType? > > I am bit confused with these two. > > Please explain these two with the proper example. > > When should we go for simpleType and when should we go for > xs:complexType? > > Also explain about simplexContent and complexContent? > > Thanks > Selvam > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Difference-between-xs%3AsimpleType---xs%3AcomplexType-tf3583684.html#a10013797 > Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 13:53:47 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






