|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Permit (greedy) conflicting wildcards
From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:43:08 -0000 To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "'Pete Cordell'" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <011901c76be0$63b59780$6401a8c0@turtle> > Nonetheless, it was because we realized that some users would > want more help from the content model itself that we are > likely to propose the notQName="##defined" > construct (which, by the way, is known informally in the > workgroup and in some blog postings I think as the "Not In > Schema" or NIS wildcard. The thing I'm having trouble understanding is that this seems to assume a rather finite and predictable schema. It seems to make the outcome of a validation episode rather dependent on the set of element declarations that happen to be lying around in your schema cache. Validation of a document containing @xml:space will succeed until you install a new version of your schema processor that has a built-in attribute declaration for @xml:space, and then it will suddenly start failing because @xml:space is now in "the schema". Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 17:43:19 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






