|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Schema 1.1: xs:anyEnumeration considered?
From: brycenesbitt <bryce1@obviously.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10278076.post@talk.nabble.com> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org How about something akin to "javax". The ability to insert an extra attribute to a non-conforming element that says "this is extended beyond the schema". Then you'd still catch mistakes in a standard type (e.g. "runtal" when "rental" was meant), but still allow true extensions (e.g. "leasing"). I like the idea of providing an enumeration, even in cases where that's just a serving suggestion or starting point. Pete Cordell wrote: > > > One thing I often see are sets of enumerations that are not extensible.... > > <xs:simpleType name="foo"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> > <xs:pattern value="[a-zA-Z0-0]{3,4}"/> > <xs:enumeration value="ABC"/> > <xs:enumeration value="DEFG"/> > <xs:anyEnumeration/> <!-- New --> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Schema-1.1%3A-xs%3AanyEnumeration-considered--tf3415265.html#a10278076 Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 23:59:19 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






