|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Defining recursive elements?
From: David Carver <kingargyle@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:20:26 -0500 Message-ID: <464DB62A.4040302@gmail.com> To: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> CC: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org Boris Kolpackov wrote: > Hi Pete, > > Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> writes: > > >> Although, just to clarify for those that are a bit fuzzy about namespaces >> in schema, commonly if people define a schema that specifies a target >> namespace, 9 times out of 10 they will also make >> elementFormDefault="qualified". >> > > Any studies to support these numbers? I just did a quick check over > a bunch of real-world schemas in our repository. Out of 18 schemas, > 7 are "unqualified" (~40%) and 11 are "qualified" (~60%). > > Most, B2B XML Schemas will use elementFormDefault="qualified". Look at any of the UBL, OAGi, STAR, AIAG, etc standards. All I believe use elementFormDefault="qualified". DaveReceived on Friday, 18 May 2007 13:18:57 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






