|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Defining recursive elements?
From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:48:37 +0200 To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-ID: <20070518064837.GA12423@karelia> Hi Pete, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> writes: > Although, just to clarify for those that are a bit fuzzy about namespaces > in schema, commonly if people define a schema that specifies a target > namespace, 9 times out of 10 they will also make > elementFormDefault="qualified". Any studies to support these numbers? I just did a quick check over a bunch of real-world schemas in our repository. Out of 18 schemas, 7 are "unqualified" (~40%) and 11 are "qualified" (~60%). -boris -- Boris Kolpackov Code Synthesis Tools CC http://www.codesynthesis.com Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data BindingReceived on Friday, 18 May 2007 06:51:57 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






