[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Defining recursive elements?

From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:48:37 +0200
To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070518064837.GA12423@karelia>
Re: Defining recursive elements?
Hi Pete,

Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> writes:

> Although, just to clarify for those that are a bit fuzzy about namespaces
> in schema, commonly if people define a schema that specifies a target
> namespace, 9 times out of 10 they will also make
> elementFormDefault="qualified".

Any studies to support these numbers? I just did a quick check over
a bunch of real-world schemas in our repository. Out of 18 schemas,
7 are "unqualified" (~40%) and 11 are "qualified" (~60%).


-boris


-- 
Boris Kolpackov
Code Synthesis Tools CC
http://www.codesynthesis.com
Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding

Received on Friday, 18 May 2007 06:51:57 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.