|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Abstract element and xsi:nil
From: Michele Vivoda <idmichele@yahoo.it>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:38:53 +0200 (CEST) To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, 'Boris Kolpackov' <boris@codesynthesis.com>, 'Morris Matsa' <mmatsa@us.ibm.com> Cc: 'Dennis Sosnoski' <dms@sosnoski.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-ID: <517350.82300.qm@web27907.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> I agree, unluckily the xsi:nil construct is present in many schemas and the 'null' concept has multiple syntaxes [1][2]... Michele Vivoda [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Apr/0033 [2] Cfr issue 37 on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Aug/0000 [3] Issue 15 cited in [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/issues/15/ --- Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ha scritto: > Almost everything connected with xsi:nil, including > the very existence of > the construct, is counter-intuitive. Best just to > ignore it. It was a > misguided attempt to force-fit a concept from the > relational model into the > XML model where it isn't needed. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > > > ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.htmlReceived on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 03:15:55 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






