[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: UPA or not UPA violation?

From: Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <72692.7305.qm@web23003.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Re: UPA or not UPA violation?

Michael Kay wrote:

> Remember what UPA stands for: unique particle
> attribution. Every child element can be unambiguously
> associated with exactly one particle in the content
> model. If there are no child elements, this is trivially
> true.

  Oh yes, I see my fault: I thought the processor had to know
wether group was used, but the UPA doesn't apply at this
level.  Thank you for the explanation.

  Regards,

--drkm




















      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 11:52:46 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.