|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: UPA or not UPA violation?
From: Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:52:07 +0200 (CEST) To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-ID: <72692.7305.qm@web23003.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Michael Kay wrote: > Remember what UPA stands for: unique particle > attribution. Every child element can be unambiguously > associated with exactly one particle in the content > model. If there are no child elements, this is trivially > true. Oh yes, I see my fault: I thought the processor had to know wether group was used, but the UPA doesn't apply at this level. Thank you for the explanation. Regards, --drkm _____________________________________________________________________________ Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.frReceived on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 11:52:46 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






