Re: implicit change of default namespace

On 28/02/2008, Ben Liblit <liblit@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>
>  > No, and a good thing too. Using defaults in the DTD to put elements in a
>  > namespace that isn't visible to the casual reader of the XML instance is a
>  > source of immense frustration to people trying to process the XML,
>
>
> OK, fair enough.  The DTD namespace trick always seemed a bit fishy to
>  me anyway.  Thanks.

"fishy" doesn't really do justice to the pain caused by this trick...



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/