Re: referencing anonymous types

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:23:01 -0700, Mark Hansen <mark@agileitinc.com>  
wrote:

>
> SCDs look good.  How much change to you anticipate to this Working  
> Draft?

The next draft will be substantially reorganized and the exposition
changed.  From the POV of what a SCD looks like, very little is changing,
although there will be additions to accomodate new XML Schema 1.1
components.

//Mary

> C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9 Jul 2008, at 13:20 , Mark Hansen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is there a standard syntax for generating references to anonymous  
>>> types?  I know that XML Schema 1.0 does not provide such a standard.   
>>> Will there be one in XML Schema 1.1 - or in some other, related,  
>>> standard?
>>
>> I'd use SCDs.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/
>>
>> But note that this is still a Working Draft, and still changing.
>>
>> --Michael Sperberg-McQueen
>>
>>