[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: UPA example

From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:07:09 +0100
Message-ID: <000d01c8d76c$05fdfb70$ea00a8c0@Codalogic>
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Re: UPA example

- Original Message From: "Michael Kay"

>> Personally I think that, subject to occurrence constraints,
>> the particle that is currently gobbling up input, should have
>> priority (i.e. they're greedy).  ...
>
> Then I suggest you make the suggestion as a comment on the last call spec
> which has just been published.

I'll do that then.  In the mean time, if any one wants to share with me why 
they think the current XSD 1.1 rules are preferable I'd interested to hear 
it.

Thanks,

Pete Cordell
Codalogic
For XML C++ data binding visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 09:07:55 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.