|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: schema arrangement or architecture
From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:00:22 +0100 To: "'Boris Kolpackov'" <boris@codesynthesis.com>, "'Andrew Welch'" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <AC34518708BF4749B815BE3B832B1941@Sealion> > My ideal schema has all its types defined globally (e.g., no > anonymous types), and all its elements and attributes -- > locally, except for the elements that are valid document roots. XQuery currently allows you to validate against a global element declaration but not against a type. With schema-aware XSLT and XQuery you may often want to validate document fragments. So I'm in favour of using global element declarations almost everywhere. By contrast, I don't think an anonymous type does much harm, because it's a completely undisruptive change to promote it subsequently to a named type. I tend to make all my simple types global, because they are very often reused, but I often keep complex types local. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2008 08:01:04 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






