|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] anyAttribute via attributeGroup refs problem
From: Christian Roth <roth@visualclick.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:43:02 +0100 To: "XML Schema Development List" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-Id: <20081111104302.1526652321@kriro.de> Hello, during schema development, I stumbled upon the following issue with anyAttribute elements included via an attributeGroup reference into a complexType: -- instance.xml -- <root xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="schema.xsd" xmlns:ns1="ns1" xmlns:ns2="ns2" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" ns1:attr="val1" ns2:attr="val2" /> -- schema.xsd -- <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xs:element name="root"> <xs:complexType> <xs:attributeGroup ref="ns1-atts"/> <xs:attributeGroup ref="ns2-atts"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:attributeGroup name="ns1-atts"> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="ns1" processContents="skip"/> </xs:attributeGroup> <xs:attributeGroup name="ns2-atts"> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="ns2" processContents="skip"/> </xs:attributeGroup> </xs:schema> I expected the given schema to validate the instance document, however I am presented with the following validation errors: [Xerces] cvc-complex-type.3.2.2: Attribute 'ns1:attr' is not allowed to appear in element 'root'. [Xerces] cvc-complex-type.3.2.2: Attribute 'ns2:attr' is not allowed to appear in element 'root'. In my understanding, both of them are allowed via the anyAttribute element allowing all attributes in the respective namespace name via wildcard. When I comment out *one* of the attributeGroup references in the "root" element's content model, the remaining namespace's attribute is no longer reported as an error, just the namespace's attribute that has been commented out (as expected). Is this a problem with my schema file (and if so, why does it validate both standalone and when performing the actual validation on an instance) or a bug in the validator? I have tried Xerces and SaxonSA, both with identical behaviour. Regards, ChristianReceived on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:43:46 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






