|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] emptiable content in particle inheritance
From: Tobias Koenig <tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:33:35 +0100 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-Id: <200902021133.35789.tobias.koenig@trolltech.com> Hej, there are the two schemas 1) <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsd:element name="doc" type="foo"/> <xsd:complexType name="foo"> <xsd:complexContent> <xsd:restriction base="bar"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element name="e1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="0"/> <xsd:element name="e2"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:complexContent> </xsd:complexType> <xsd:complexType name="bar"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element name="e1"/> <xsd:element name="e2"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:schema> 2) <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xs:complexType name="base"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="e1" type="xs:string" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="derived"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="base"> <xs:choice minOccurs="0"> <xs:element name="e1" type="xs:string" /> </xs:choice> </xs:restriction> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> In both cases a complex type with emptiable particle derives by restriction from a complex type with non-emptiable particle. However the first schema is valid according to xml schema test suite (and saxon validator) but the second is not. So what is the real issue in the second schema? That a choice particle is inherited from an sequence particle? Thanks in advance Ciao, TobiasReceived on Monday, 2 February 2009 10:34:20 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






