|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] the meaning of lax
From: Tobias Koenig <tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:36:36 +0100 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Message-Id: <200901211736.36923.tobias.koenig@trolltech.com> Hej, in schema spec 1.1 'lax' is defined as If the item has a uniquely determined declaration available, it must be ·valid· with respect to that definition, that is, ·validate· if you can, don't worry if you can't. I don't know if it is just me as a non-native speaker, but somehow that sentence confuses me... Let's say there is an element that matches a wildcard that has processContents 'lax'. 1) if I find a declaration for that element and a) can validate it successfully -> everything ok b) can not validate it successfully -> ?!? 2) if I cannot find a declaration for that element -> everything ok What happens in case a 1b? Could the sentence in the spec maybe rephrased? Ciao, TobiasReceived on Thursday, 5 February 2009 16:38:02 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






