[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

the meaning of lax

From: Tobias Koenig <tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:36:36 +0100
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-Id: <200901211736.36923.tobias.koenig@trolltech.com>
the meaning of lax

Hej,

in schema spec 1.1 'lax' is defined as

	If the item has a uniquely determined declaration available, it must be ·valid· with respect to that definition,
        that is, ·validate· if you can, don't worry if you can't.

I don't know if it is just me as a non-native speaker, but somehow that sentence confuses me...
Let's say there is an element that matches a wildcard that has processContents 'lax'.

1) if I find a declaration for that element and

	a) can validate it successfully -> everything ok

	b) can not validate it successfully -> ?!?

2) if I cannot find a declaration for that element

	-> everything ok

What happens in case a 1b? Could the sentence in the spec maybe rephrased?

Ciao,
Tobias
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 16:38:02 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.