|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is vc:type(Un)Available and vc:facet(Un)Available redundant?
From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:10:32 +0100 To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@mitre.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <D86CFC8E84974682918DA8B175938745@Sealion> > > In XSD 1.1, vendors are allowed to add their own types and facets. > > Wow! > > I totally missed that in the specification. Would you point > me to the section that discusses this please? > See http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#idef-idep, clauses 3 and 4. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkayReceived on Monday, 29 June 2009 16:11:09 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|

![RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is vc:type(Un)Available and vc:facet(Un)Available redundant?](/images/get_stylus.gif)




