[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is vc:type(Un)Available and vc:facet(Un)Available redundant?

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:10:32 +0100
To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@mitre.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D86CFC8E84974682918DA8B175938745@Sealion>
RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is vc:type(Un)Available and  vc:facet(Un)Available  redundant?
> > In XSD 1.1, vendors are allowed to add their own types and facets.
> 
> Wow!
> 
> I totally missed that in the specification. Would you point 
> me to the section that discusses this please?
> 


See http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#idef-idep, clauses 3 and 4.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 16:11:09 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.