[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Resolution of "ref" attribute in case of <override>

From: Kevin Braun <kbraun@obj-sys.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:18:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4AE069BF.9070706@obj-sys.com>
To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Re: Resolution of "ref" attribute in case of <override>
Very well.  Thank you, Michael and Michael.

On 10/22/2009 4:08 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
>> How will the prefix in the ref attribute in the 
>> attributeGroup element be handled?  If D2' is the result of 
>> applying the xs:override transform, and D2' contains an 
>> element information item that is identical to the one for the 
>> <attributeGroup>, I expect it will have [in-scope namespaces] 
>> based on what we see above; namely, the qrs prefix will 
>> necessarily resolve to "uri:example.com".  Is that correct?
>>     
>
> Yes. In fact, this doesn't even depend on the stylesheet being schema-aware
> and on @ref being known to be a QName. The element is copied using
> <xsl:copy-of>, which copies all the in-scope namespaces of an element,
> including therefore the namespace binding for "qrs".
>   
>> Also, a second question.  I don't speak XSLT, but the 
>> stylesheet given for the transformation for xs:override 
>> includes a comment that says :
>>
>>   <!--* change xs:override elements:  children which match 
>>       * children of $overrideElement are replaced, others are
>>       * kept, and at the end all children of $overrideElement
>>       * not already inserted are added.
>>       *-->
>>
>> The "at the end all children..." clause doesn't appear to be 
>> consistent with the description that precedes the stylesheet. 
>>  Specifically, I don't see where a child of O1 that does not 
>> correspond to a child of D2 
>> would be put into D2'.   Perhaps I misunderstand the comment, 
>> or perhaps 
>> it isn't consistent with the XSLT that is there (again, I 
>> don't speak XSLT).  Is there an inconsistency here?
>>     
>
> I think Michael Sperberg McQueen has explained this part. It is complex and
> my brain aches a little every time I look at it, but I think I have
> convinced myself that it works. It would benefit, however, from some serious
> testing: there is an assumption that we will produce tests before exiting
> CR.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 
>
>
>
>   
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:20:56 GMT

Subscribe to the Stylus Scoop newsletter for helpful XML tips and tutorials.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

Download Stylus Studio 6 XML Enterprise Edition

Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.