|
[XMLSCHEMA-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ?
From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:11:58 +0100 To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> Cc: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "'XMLSchema at XML4Pharma'" <XMLSchema@XML4Pharma.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Message-ID: <7A8AE1B6D9514C4C9954ACAA0F9C930B@Sealion> > While my > ACSOOD proposal remains very incomplete and has a variety of > problems, I think it does more or less signal my thinking > about questions like this [1]. > Yes. It's close the the way I think about it. It appears to handle a chain of redefinition (A redefines B, B redefines C) in the same way as I do. It's not clear what answers it gives for more complex redefinition graphs. And it doesn't appear to have anything to say about chameleon include. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkayReceived on Friday, 16 October 2009 20:12:32 GMT |
Subscribe in XML format
|






